AGARTALA, Sep 2 (TIWN): Narendra Modi, Amit Shah led national BJP’s leadership no comparison for Tripura State’s lameduck BJP leadership which still busy in childish bickerings rather than breaking CPI-M’s backbone on key issues. State BJP’s Sunil Deodhar, Biplab Deb not only failed to nail Manik Sarkar Govt by strong CBI investigations into various Chit Fund and Central Funds scams, also BJP leadership failed to stop CPI-M’s fake vote bank politics as CPI-M successfully enrolled over 10 to 20% fake voters in each of sixty MLA seats to swing election results in its favour. Tripura voters witnessing the fact that BJP’s Union Home Ministry and CBI failed to arrest a single CPI-M Minister or even scratch Manik Sarkar’s Govt other than daily mouthful of attacks which has no affect on CPI-M’s votebank.Tripura BJP’s one after another political missteps only signaling that immature newcomer Biplab Deb or outsider Sunil Deodhar are no match for cunning Manik Sarkar led State CPI-M party’s manipulated corruption with electoral rolls.

State BJP’s suicidal steps like admitting tainted Sudip Barman & Co into State BJP not only dented its clean image, also publishing books against Manik Sarkar in Maharastra in Marathi language rather than publishing in Bengali in Tripura only establish political immaturity.

Not only failure in conducting successful CBI investigations against CPI-M but failure in engaging Election Commission to weed out 10 to 20% fake voters from electoral lists are seen as State BJP’s political immaturity.

After unsuccessful ventures in Meghalaya to establish BJP, Suni Deodhar led RSS functionaries living in fools paradise that Prime Minister Modi’s multiple visits or barrage of Central Ministers visit        before Tripura elections would be able to wipe off CPI-M from power.

Modi visited Tripura multiple time before 2014 Lok Sabha and Tripura Assembly elections, even filled Astabal Ground (Vivekananda Maidan) beyond capacity but did BJP secure a single MLA seat        or make inroads in lastly held ADC elections ?

If BJP fails to defeat CPI-M in Feb 2018’s Assembly Poll, rather than corrupt CPI-M, BJP’s State leadership’s political immaturity will remain as the main reason in State’s Political history.

Voting percentage in Tripura varies from the lowest of 86.78% in the city to the highest of 96.46% in the rural constituencies. Only four out of sixty constituencies recorded less than 90% votes. This, when an average of 9% voters are false, and the winning margin less than 3000 in 61.66% constituencies, signifies the lack of authenticity of the elections in Tripura. However, rather than raising a serious doubt in the minds of the authorities regarding figures which are clear statistical outliers , the authorities choose to reward the state election officials.

That at this moment it is physically impossible for the opposition parties to utilize the existing system to get the false names deleted without the active co-operation of the Election Commission. For example, even if the BLA (Booth Level Agent) knows that a certain person is dead or away, how does he collect proof? The onus of proof depends on the BLA and the BLA has to depend on the openly biased government officials, for proof. He would forfeit all government economic assistance that is available in a village. All these systems work only when the administration is by and large neutral, not in a state like Tripura where every official is a committed official.

An election with this Electoral Roll would be detrimental to democracy and the will of the people of the state of Tripura would be suppressed again.

The Election Commission should use EVM with VVPAT in Tripura. That’ll allay the fear in the minds of people that EVMs are manipulated.

The Presiding officers and Micro observers of all the booths from other states. This is the most important step and most essential for free and fair elections in this state. There is ample time and preparation can start from now.

Number of False voters identifiedin Boxanagar  > 3072

It is important to relate this finding with the electoral history of 20 Boxanagar Constituency.

The average percentage of votes cast and winning margin in previous elections is given below.

Year	Left	Congress	Margin	Winning %	Voting %
1977	W		1141	10.23%	84.81%
1983	W		374	2.73%	88.79%
1988		W	532	3.18%	91.32%
199	W		4303	21.86%	84.48%
199		W	463	2.18%	89.12%
200	W		2316	9.49%	86.20%
200	W		692	2.49%	94.46%
201	W		2521	7.84%	96.30%

With this I am adding the voting percentage of all 60 constituencies. It is obvious that the average voting  percentage of 91.2%, is much higher than any other state in India. An average false vote of 3000 + in any booth would pave way for 37/60 seats to a party. The CPIM has been using this technique and none have been able to break this jinx. The results of 2013 Assembly Elections are given below. Belying all expectations of the people, CPIM won 50/60 seats, though the opposition got 46% of the votes polled. CPIM managed 51%.

Assembly  Constituency no	CPI-M +	Cong +	Margin  < 3000 highlighted	Voting %
1 Simna (ST)	17063	13244	3819	93.65
2 Mohanpur	18368	19143	775	94.80
3 Bamutia (SC)	19744	16994	2750	95.61
4 Barjala (SC)	17467	17728	261	94.64
5 Khayerpur	20972	19675	1297	95.37
6 Agartala	19398	22160	2762	92.14
7 Ramnagar	18060	17995	65	89.85
8 Town Bordowali	15414	22474	7960	86.86
9 Banamalipur	13702	19464	5762	86.78
10 Majlishpur	21304	18375	2929	96.36
11 Mandaibazar (ST)	19275	17450	1825	93.06
12 Takarjala (ST)	17315	16108	1207	91.91
13 Pratapgarh (SC)	23977	21845	2132	95.27
14 Badharghat (SC)	23666	24309	643	93.70
15 Kamalasagar	19808	14393	5415	94.76
16 Bishalgarh	20987	19263	1724	95.73
17 Golaghati (ST)	19181	14648	4533	94.08
18 Suryamaninagar	21613	19979	1634	95.62
19 Charilam (ST)	16479	15138	1341	93.80
20 Boxanagar	17100	14579	2521	96.30
21 Nalchar (SC)	21969	13862	8107	96.46
22 Sonamura	18043	16517	1526	95.13
23 Dhanpur	21286	15269	6017	96.07
24 Ramchandraghat (ST)	19504	11613	7891	93.07
25 Khowai	22692	13859	8833	96.17
26 Asharambari (ST)	17826	10609	7217	92.92
27 Kalyanpur-Pramodenagar	19755	15975	3780	93.87
28 Teliamura	18357	17044	1313	93.51
29 Krishnapur (ST)	17125	11083	6042	93.75
30 Bagma (ST)	23600	19525	4075	95.04
31 Radhakishorepur	19303	20140	837	94.07
32 Matarbar	22178	20868	1310	95.78
33 Kakraban-Salgarh (SC)	24947	17757	7190	94.98
34 Rajnagar (SC)	23942	12545	11397	95.10
35 Belonia	20585	15761	4824	95.73
36 Santirbazar (ST)	20798	17042	3756	94.88
37 Hrishyamukh	25009	12580	12429	96.22
38 Jolaibari (ST)	24295	14952	9343	95.31
39 Manu (ST)	21320	14424	6896	96.01
40 Sabroom	21404	16197	5207	95.68
41 Ampinagar (ST)	15714	12930	2784	93.06
42 Amarpur	19075	15053	4022	95.97
43 Karbook (ST)	15526	12091	3437	94.17
44 Raima Valley (ST)	18527	15651	2876	92.51
45 Kamalpur	19204	17690	1514	92.72
46 Surma (SC)	18648	16786	1862	92.66
47 Ambassa (ST)	18755	17701	1054	92.82
48 Karmachhara (ST)	14039	15411	1372	91.10
49 Chawamanu (ST)	15870	14375	1495	89.96
50 Pabiachhara (SC)	18504	17254	1250	92.74
51 Fatikroy (SC)	17899	16034	1865	92.52
52 Chandipur	21009	13380	7629	91.92
53 Kailashahar	18372	18857	484	91.27
54 Kadamtala-Kurti	14514	12585	1929	91.22
55 Bagbassa	17991	15059	2932	90.53
56 Dharmanagar	16147	17991	1844	91.45
57 Jubarajnagar	18602	15724	2878	94
58 Panisagar	15196	13285	1911	92.13
59 Pencharthal (ST)	16601	15584	1017	91.41
60 Kanchanpur (ST)	17186	16105	1081	90.59