Make this your homepage
Tripura News
Home > Tripura News
Tripura Police violates SC order, arrests youth for FB Posts after politically motivated complaint by Pratima Bhowmik’s aide
TIWN Oct 13, 2019
Tripura Police violates SC order, arrests youth for FB Posts after politically motivated complaint by Pratima Bhowmik’s aide
PHOTO :

AGARTALA, Oct 13 (TIWN): ‘Social media users can not be arrested under Article 19, Article 21’, said Supreme Court of India while releasing Journalist Prashant Kanojia on June 11, 2018, but arrests of social media users are frequent in Tripura in compare to any other state in India although not in a single case police could file any proper chargesheet. Added by harassments of 400 youths in last 2 months for social media posts, today one more person was detained by Tripura Police from Manipur after he commented against BJP MP Pratima Bhowmik. Police came in quick action when one Sunit Sarkar filed a case against one Anupam Sinha in the West PS, Agartala. Today from Manipur, Anupam Sinha was arrested, said West PS OC-Debaprasad Roy. This arrest is according to Supreme Court’s guideline is however “Illegal”. Earlier, police arrested Tripura Journalist, internet users in same allegation but what is funny in this circle is that till today Tripura Police could not take action against Pratima Bhowmik who gave murder threat to an IPS officer on camera.

Journalist Prashant Kanojia case & SC’s guideline :

Journalist Prashant Kanojia who was arrested over his sarcastic social media post, after he put a video clip with a tweet "Ishq chhupaye nahin chhupta Yogiji (can't hide love in this way, Yogiji)," on June 6. In the FIR, Lucknow police said he had made "objectionable comments" on Adityanath and maligned his image.  Two days after his tweeted, Kanojia was arrested without any arrest warrant and was dragged from Delhi to Uttar Pradesh. However, good news is that while giving bail order for Kanojia, Supreme Court of India has clearly stated, a person can not be arrested over his / her social media post.

In a divisional bench of Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Indira Banerjee, Supreme Court in response to a petition filed by Jagisha Arora, wife of Prasant Kanojia said, “In this Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the arrest and incarceration of her husband – Prashant Kanojia against whom proceedings have been initiated under Sections 500 and 505 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 67 of the Information Techonlogy Act. We need not comment on the nature of the posts/tweets for which the action has been taken. The question is whether the petitioner’s husband-Prashant Kanojia ought to have been deprived of his 2 liberty for the offence alleged. The answer to that question is prima facie in the negative”.

“The fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India and in particular Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India are non-negotiable”, said SC.

“We are not inclined to sit back on technical grounds. In exercise of power under Article 142 of the Constitution of India this Court can mould the reliefs to do complete justice”.

“We direct that the petitioner’s husband be immediately released on bail on conditions to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Chief Judicial Magistrate. It is made clear that this Order is not to be construed as an approval of the posts/tweets in the social media. This order is passed in view of the excessiveness of the action taken. Needless to mention that the proceedings will take their own course in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly”, said SC.

So, under Article 19 and 21, Social media users need not to be afraid. Let us know what is Article 19 and Article 21 :

Article 19 : Article 19 of Constitution of India and Right to Freedom. Article 19-22 (Right to Freedom) deal with the different aspects of Personal Liberty, the basic right of a citizen in a democracy. These articles are as follows: Article 19: Protection of certain rights regarding freedom of speech, etc.

Article 21 : Article 21 reads as: “No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to a procedure established by law.”

According to Bhagwati, J., Article 21 “embodies a constitutional value of supreme importance in a democratic society.” Iyer, J., has characterized Article 21 as “the procedural magna carta protective of life and liberty. This right has been held to be the heart of the Constitution, the most organic and progressive provision in our living constitution, the foundation of our laws.

Article 21 can only be claimed when a person is deprived of his “life” or “personal liberty” by the “State” as defined in Article 12. Violation of the right by private individuals is not within the preview of Article 21.

Article 21 secures two rights:

1)  Right to life, and

2) Right to personal liberty.

The Article prohibits the deprivation of the above rights except according to a procedure established by law. Article 21 corresponds to the Magna Carta of 1215, the Fifth Amendment to the American Constitution, Article 40(4) of the Constitution of Eire 1937, and Article XXXI of the Constitution of Japan, 1946.

Article 21 applies to natural persons. The right is available to every person, citizen or alien. Thus, even a foreigner can claim this right. It, however, does not entitle a foreigner the right to reside and settle in India, as mentioned in Article 19 (1) (e).

The Recent Statement by SC Justice Dipak Gupta who criticized ruling Govt for such illegal actions :

On 7th September Supreme Court Justice Dipak Gupta criticized arrests incidents under IT Act, Section 66A whenever anyone is criticizing the Govt

The Justice made it clear that nobody can be arrested for facebook posts. Dipak Gupta also said Bishal Singh’s arrest at Sabroom is totally injustice and ill-attempted to snatch freedom-of-speech.

Back in 2018, November one poor man Dipak Debnath was arrested at night 2 am without any warrant just because he shared a news against BJP leaders. Also various opposition social media users were detained, one journalist Saikat Talapatra was arrested from Agartala Airport who not even put anyone’s name while hitting the opposite person.

On September 7, SC Justice Deepak Gupta, judge of Supreme Court, spoke at length about the chilling effect caused by sedition law on legitimate criticism on the organs of state. He also mentioned about the threat of contempt action stifling fair criticism of judiciary.

He was speaking at the a workshop organised by Praleen Public Charitable Trust at Ahmedabad, Justice Deepak Gupta of the Supreme Court spoke at length on the topic "Law of Sedition in India and Freedom of Expression".

Notably, Justice Gupta mentioned about the recent incidents of application of criminal law against rapper Hard Kaur, Bengal BJP leader Priyanka Sharma, Manipur journalist Kishorchandra Wangkhem, Tamil film director Pa Ranjith etc, for voicing their opinions.

Add your Comment
Comments (0)

Special Articles

Sanjay Majumder Sanjay Majumder
Anirban Mitra Anirban Mitra