Make this your homepage
Tripura News
Home > Tripura News
Lotus Blooming by Election Hacking ? Resigned IAS, DM exposed how EVM, VVPAT steal votes, says, ‘It’s FOOL-proof process’ : Tripura (Badharghat) Postal Ballot voting rate of BJP candidate stables allegation’s ground
TIWN Oct 1, 2019
Lotus Blooming by Election Hacking ? Resigned IAS, DM exposed how EVM, VVPAT steal votes, says, ‘It’s FOOL-proof process’ : Tripura (Badharghat) Postal Ballot voting rate of BJP candidate stables allegation’s ground
PHOTO : Left : Kannan Gopinathan's tweet, Right : BJP celebrates election victory (File)

AGARTALA / NEW DELHI, Oct 1 (TIWN): This is the time, when opposition parties may directly raise question on the reliability on EVM, VVPAT in the electoral process which amid massive anti-incumbency shocked by lotus-blooming beyond ideas, fueled by a section of main-stream media backed TV channels’ Exit Polls ahead of Lok Sabha Election, because this time former bureaucrat Kannan Gopinathan has exposed how these machines have successfully betrayed voters by fraudmeans. This issue is sensitive in case of Tripura which has undergone a recent poll at Badharghat by-election with an unexpected win for the BJP amid various anti-people decision of the BJP Govt, but when EVM voting empowered the BJP candidate, postal ballots have significantly betrayed BJP by allocating only 27 votes to the candidate out of 400 votes. Also 24 VVPAT machines “malfunctioned” on the counting day.

A serious question which was raised after Lok Sabha Election, how a Govt’s winning seats can be increased than the previous election amid suffered economic condition, can get the answer in the statement of Kannan Gopinath below : (The Bharatiya Janata Party (of the NDA) achieved an absolute majority with 282 seats out of 543 in 2014. But in 2019 Lok Sabha Election, with 303 seats in the Lok Sabha and 73 seats in the Rajya Sabha, the BJP is the largest NDA party in the parliament)

Taking strong exception to the Election Commission’s (EC) former IAS, who was District Magistrate (DM) Kannan Gopinathan stated position that the introduction of VVPAT (voter verifiable paper audit trail) machines has made elections more transparent, on Tuesday said that the VVPAT has actually made rigging easier. This sensitive news published recently in national media and first in the National Herald.

Gopinathan, who recently quit the prestigious Indian Administrative Service (IAS) over the Modi government’s handling of the Kashmir issue, has argued how VVPAT has disconnected the Ballot Unit (on which a voter casts his/her vote) of the electronic voting machine from the Control Unit (in which votes are stored in electronic form), reported the “National Herald”.

A VVPAT prints a slip showing the symbol and candidate’s name for which a voter has voted. This slip is visible to the voter for 7 seconds before it falls down into a box where it is stored for counting if need be.

As the District Magistrate, Gopinathan has had a first hand experience of handling the EVMs and VVPAT and is well aware of how the machines function.

“So, by introducing VVPATs, we have created so much vulnerability to an otherwise fool-proof process, while not adding adequate checks, either in the process or during the counting. I feel there is an urgent need to address this so that the process become more robust,” Gopinathan said in a series of tweets.

“Unlike before, the Ballot Unit (BU) is not connected to Control Unit (CU - Memory of EVM) directly any more. It is connected through VVPAT. Means what you press on that blue button in the BU is not registering the vote in the CU anymore. But what VVPAT communicates to CU is! This itself is a serious design flaw. But I guess this was done to make use of the existing CUs and BUs. Existing EVMs did not provide for VVPAT ports. So VVPAT was so designed to mimic as a CU for the BU and as a BU for the CU. I think. That is dangerous!"

“For VVPAT now controls two things: 1) What is being shown to the public in the form of paper slips. Or the perception and trust factor. 2) What is actually getting registered in the Control Unit as a vote. Or the actual vote factor.

“Question now is whether VVPAT can be manipulated? If it can be, then how and when in the process. And if it is, then do we have a fool proof process check,” he said.

“But now on to when and how? As I understand, VVPAT is a simple processor, a memory and a printer unit. It has a memory because serial numbers, names and symbols of the candidates need to be loaded on to it before the elections, so that it gets printed in the paper slip.

“And if it has a processor and a programmable memory, it can be hacked. Any malware downloaded on to it can cause the entire system to misbehave. With the kind of design, it is clear that the whole process can be vitiated by manipulating the VVPAT,” Gopinathan said.

He said that a VVPAT can possibly be programmed in a way that it sends different signals to the printing unit and to the Control Unit. In other words, suppose a person votes for Candidate ‘A’. The rigged VVPAT will print the paper slip for Candidate ‘A’ only to the satisfaction of the voter, but it would send a different vote to the CU, say for Candidate ‘B’.

Gopinathan argued that it is possible because the engineers have the access to VVPATs after the sequence of the candidates is known.

“The strongest defense any election officer has had to the question of 'What if the CU is already programmed/hacked before it comes to you', was that -

‘But they wouldn't know the sequence of candidates. So, whatever they may program, they wouldn't know who is at what number!’, he added.

“That answers the when question. Now to the how. For symbols are loaded on to the VVPAT by the engineers from their Laptops/Jigs after the candidates are finalized. VVPATs are connected to external devices after candidate sequence is known!!”

“When one can access the VVPAT after the candidate sequence is known, and can connect a laptop/computer/Symbol Loading Jig, is precisely when one can load a malware also into the VVPAT,” he said.

This access should not have been provided. And that fool-proof check is what we have compromised with the introduction of VVPAT, Gopinathan asserted.

Questions over the impeccability of EVMs have been raised time and again. In 2009, after the BJP had lost the Lok Sabha elections, its spokesperson GVL Narasimha Rao penned a book with foreword by L.K. Advani in which he argued against using EVMs for voting.

After 2017 Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections, the Opposition vigorously raised the issue of EVMs being manipulated. The jury is still out on the issue, though EC has claimed time and again that after introduction of VVPATs, the process has become more transparent.

 

Add your Comment
Comments (0)

Special Articles

Sanjay Majumder Sanjay Majumder
Anirban Mitra Anirban Mitra