Make this your homepage
Tripura News
Home > Tripura News
After 6 Years of Supreme Court's Order of Quashing Section 66A, now Central Govt Ordered States to Withdraw all Cases against Netizens under 66A, IT Act : Tripura made Record Level Netizens' Arrests, FIRs under Biplab Deb, Ratan Lal
TIWN July 15, 2021
After 6 Years of Supreme Court's Order of Quashing Section 66A, now Central Govt Ordered States to Withdraw all Cases against Netizens under 66A, IT Act :  Tripura made Record Level Netizens' Arrests, FIRs under Biplab Deb, Ratan Lal
PHOTO : Left : CM Biplab Deb, Law Minister Ratan Lal Nath, Right : Congress activist was arrested.

AGARTALA, July 15 (TIWN): Amid ongoing various cases against opposition leaders / activists based on their social media posts under the Section 66A of the IT Act, Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has directed all the State Govts and their DGPs with withdraw FIRs lodged based on Section 66A under the IT Act. Under the State BJP Govt led by CM Biplab Deb and Law Minister Law Minister Ratan Lal Nath, uncountable numbers of youths were arrested just because they opposed the Govt's decision or criticized the Chief Minister or ruling party members in social media. In Tripura, the level of Govt's intimidation has surpassed to that extreme that people were arrested just because they had shared a news written against the Govt's decision. Recently against various Communist leaders, cases were registered after they talked about self-defence. Tripura has indeed made a record breaking numbers of cases under 66A in various police stations but since the MHA's order all the FIRs have turned null and void.

The Centre today advised the states and UTs to direct police stations in their respective jurisdictions to “immediately withdraw the cases registered under the repealed Section 66A of the Information Technology Act”. The directive has come days after the Supreme Court expressed shock that the law was being invoked even six years after it was struck down by the apex court. 

This comes days after the Supreme Court said it was shocking that people were still being booked and tried under the section scrapped by it six years ago. Section 66A of the IT Act, 2000 stated that any person who by electronic means sends any information that is grossly offensive or has a menacing character; or any information which he knows to be false, but for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and with fine. The Supreme Court had in its judgment dated March 24, 2015 in the matter of Shreya Singhal Vs. Union of India, struck down Section 66A, calling it “vague“ and “arbitrary”.

The home ministry also requested that if any case had been booked under the repealed section, it should be immediately withdrawn. People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), a civil rights group, had last week informed the apex court that 745 cases being tried under Section 66A were still pending before various trial courts in 11 states of the country. In an application filed before the top court, PUCL claimed prosecution under the scrapped law continued to be in use not only within police stations, but also in cases before trial courts across India. In some cases, trial courts went ahead with framing charges under the defunct IT provision, even after taking cognisance of the court’s 2015 judgment, the SC was told. SC, while expressing distress and shock at Section 66A still being in use six years after it declared it as “vague and arbitrary”, gave the government two weeks to file its reply, and PUCL was given a week to file its rejoinder.

In Tripura, opposition party leaders, editor, journalists, faced such cases under Section 66A at a massive number under Biplab Deb Govt.

 

Add your Comment
Comments (0)

Special Articles

Sanjay Majumder Sanjay Majumder
Anirban Mitra Anirban Mitra