Make this your homepage
India News
Home > India News
'Hate politics, Mumbai bomb blasts, riots': AIMPLB in SC on plea against Places of Worship Act
TIWN
'Hate politics, Mumbai bomb blasts, riots': AIMPLB in SC on plea against Places of Worship Act
PHOTO : TIWN

New Delhi, Oct 9 (TTIWN): Ahead of the Supreme Court’s scheduled hearing on petitions against Place of Worship (Special Provisions) Act on October 11, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) has submitted a fresh plea urging the top court to not interfere with the 1991 Act, citing disturbances in the law and order situation.

AIMPLB, in its plea, quoted the finding of Srikrishna Commission set up to enquire into the causes of the riots in Mumbai in December 1992 and January 1993 and the causes of the serial bomb blasts that occurred in March 1993. "The unequivocal finding of the Commission is that the December 1992 riots were due to the hurt feeling that the Muslims felt by the shameful act of demolition of Babri Masjid on 6 December 1992 which were followed till January 1993," it said. 

The plea contended that while dealing with the causes of the bomb blasts that occurred in Mumbai, the commission unequivocally found that had there been no riots in December 1992-January 1993 in Mumbai, there would not have been the bomb blasts in March 1993 and unequivocally held that there is a causal connection between the riots of December 1992-January 1993 and the bomb blasts of March 1993. 

"Sequel to those riots our country has seen a carnage that occurred in February 2002 in burning of the coaches of Sabarmati express followed by the systematic carnage of Muslims in Gujarat. The salutary object of the Act is to prevent such disturbance of public order and to maintain public peace and tranquillity and strengthen basic feature of secularism," said the plea, seeking to implead in the matter.  The Muslim body said there appears to be a trend of filing the PIL petitions selectively targeting the issues relating to a particular minority community with the intention to use the pendency of such cases to fuel hate politics on the ground. 

"This court must not allow such unregulated PILs which has potential to create uncalled for new items; consequentially leading to publicity stunts for these petitioners," it said.

Add your Comment
Comments (0)

Special Articles

Sanjay Majumder Sanjay Majumder
Anirban Mitra Anirban Mitra